Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Gambit Tiger just stuffed crafty. Fantastic. game # 63. ck it out (NT)

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 09:04:47 10/28/00

Go up one level in this thread


On October 28, 2000 at 11:43:14, Roy Brunjes wrote:

>On October 28, 2000 at 01:07:40, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>It really was nice. I was beginning to doubt Gambit had anything when it
>>uncorked a really neat shot deserving of a diagram:
>>
>>[Event "?"]
>>[Site "?"]
>>[Date "28/10/2000"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White "SubtleOne"]
>>[Black "crafty"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[WhiteElo "2979"]
>>[BlackElo "2992"]
>>[Opening "D66 QGD: Orthodox Defense, Bd3 Line"]
>>
>>{Time control = 5 3 Engine book(s): ct.tbk }
>>1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 d5 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e3 O-O 6.Nf3 Nbd7 7.Rc1 c6 8.Bd3 h6 9.Bf4
>>dxc4 10.Bxc4 Nb6 11.Bd3 Nh5 12.Be5 f6 13.Bg3 Nxg3 14.hxg3 Nd5 15.Nh4 Rf7 16.Qh5
>>Nxc3 17.bxc3 Ba3 18.Rb1 Qd5 19.Qg6 f5 20.Rb3 Rf6 21.Qh5 Bd6 22.Qe8+ Rf8 23.Qg6
>>Qa5 24.Bc4 Rf6 25.Qe8+ Kh7 26.Nf3 Rg6 27.Bd3 Qxa2 28.Nd2 Qa1+ 29.Bb1 Qa5 30.e4
>>Rb8 31.e5 Ba3
>>
>>[D]1rb1Q3/pp4pk/2p1p1rp/q3Pp2/3P4/bRP3P1/3N1PP1/1B2K2R w K a3 9 1
>>
>>32.Ne4 Bc1 33.Qe7 Kh8 34.Nf6 gxf6 35.exf6 Bd7 36.f4 Rbg8 37.f7 Qc7 38.Ke2 Bxf4
>>39.fxg8Q+ Kxg8 40.gxf4 Rxg2+ 41.Kf1 Rg7 42.Qh4 c5 43.Qxh6 cxd4 44.Bd3 dxc3
>>45.Be2 Kf7 46.Qh5+ Kf6 47.Qh4+ Kf7 48.Rxb7 Qc8 49.Rg1 Rxg1+ 50.Kxg1 e5 51.Bc4+
>>Kg7 52.Qg5+ Kh7 53.Qxf5+ Kh8 54.Qf6+ Kh7 55.f5 Qc5+ 56.Kg2 Qxc4 57.Rxd7+ Qf7
>>58.Qxf7+ {crafty resigns} 1-0
>>
>>                                       Albert
>
>Nicely played by Gambit Tiger to be sure.  Century 3.0 (with STORM) personality
>finds an improvement however:
>
>After 23. ... Qa5, STORM wants to play 24. Nxf5! and breakthrough on the h file.
> The line STORM wants to play out is:  24. ... Rxf5 25. Rxh6 Bd7 26. g4! Qxa2
>(everything else is a disaster it seems) 27. gxf5 Rf8 [or 27.... Qxb3 28. f6 and
>mate in 6] 28. Rh7 and Black is doomed -- in fact mate in 12 seen after 32
>seconds by STORM.  The moves for white are generated at 5 3 time controls, the
>defences for Black I let STORM think for at least a minute on each (sometimes
>much more).

24.Nxf5 is winning but it is not the right way to analyze.

programs may miss the right defence in a game.

It is better to use a normal program for black and not storm because I do not
trust storm's evaluations.

After 24.Nxf5 Rxf5 25.Rxh6 normal programs see that white has a winning
advantage in a few minutes(evaluation of more than +3)

They can also see that black has no alternative for 24...Rxf5 without a bigger
advantage for white and the conclusion is that 24.Nxf5 is winning.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.