Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:19:50 10/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2000 at 14:46:49, Uri Blass wrote:
>[Event "COMPUTER STORE"]
>[Site "COMPUTER STORE"]
>[Date "2000.10.07"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "wochnik"]
>[Black "moshe"]
>[Result "*"]
>[ECO "D90"]
>[PlyCount "28"]
>[EventDate "2000.10.07"]
>
>{183MB. ACER_6100} 1. d4 {0} 1... Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 d5 5. Nxd5
>Nxd5 6. e4 Nf6 7. e5 Nfd7 8. c5 O-O 9. Bc4 e6 10. h4 b6 11. h5 bxc5 12. hxg6
>hxg6 13. Bg5 Qe8 14. Qc1
>
>This position is from a correspomdence game of my friend moshe
>White did a mistake in writing the game correctly and meant 5.cxd5 and not
>5.Nxd5
>White discover the mistake only later when he tried to play 7.Bc4 that was an
>illegal move.
>
>Black believed that programs have no problems to win with a piece advantage and
>prefered to devote more time for other games.
>The moves of black are typical computer moves.
>
>Black discovered only at move 14 that there are problems to win the game.
>Analysis with chess programs proved him that the typical computer moves f6 or f5
>are losing and that he has to think about a way to save the game.
>
>Moshe played finally Bb7 when this move probably leads to a draw(the game is now
>at move 22 and it is probably going to be a draw).
>
>I am interested to know what is the evaluation of chess programs of the position
>after 14.Qc1
>
>Here is the relevant position
>
>[D]rnb1qrk1/p1pn1pb1/4p1p1/2p1P1B1/2BP4/5N2/PP3PP1/R1Q1K2R b KQ - 0 1
>
>I am interested in the evaluation of gambittiger in order to know if it
>understands that black is not better(Chessmaster6000(ss=10) can see after some
>hours evaluation of 0.00 but still wants to play the move f6 and other programs
>that moshe used are not better)
>
>I did not analyze f6 and f5 but I believe that moshe knows that these moves are
>losing because he told me that he analyzed the position with chess programs for
>50 hours
>
>Uri
Gambit 1.0 Cel 433 48 Mb.
; 00:00:00.5 1. Score: 1.14 depth: 7 Ba6
; 00:00:00.4 1. Score: 0.52 depth: 7 f6 Bh6 g5 Bxg7 Kxg7 Bd3 Rh8 exf6+ Nxf6
Qxg5+ Kf7 Rxh8 Qxh8 Qxc5
; 00:00:00.1 1. Score: 0.70 depth: 8 f5 Qf4 cxd4 Qh4 Kf7 Bf6 Nxf6 exf6
; 00:00:01.8 1. Score: 0.86 depth: 8 f5 Qf4 Nb6 Bh6 Nxc4 Bxg7 Ne3 fxe3 Kxg7
; 00:00:02.0 1. Score: 0.24 depth: 9 f5 Qf4 Bb7 Bh6 Rf7 Ng5 Bxh6 Rxh6 Re7
Bd3 cxd4
; 00:00:03.0 1. Score: 0.24 depth: 10 f5 Qf4
; 00:00:10.0 1. Score: 0.32 depth: 11 f5 Qf4 Rf7 Bh6 Nf8 Ng5 Bxh6 Rxh6 Re7
Bd3 Ba6 Bc2 cxd4
; 00:00:20.4 1. Score: 0.34 depth: 12 f5 Qf4 Rf7 Bh6 Nf8 Ng5 Bxh6 Rxh6 cxd4
Bd3 Re7 Qf3 Nc6
; 00:00:46.1 1. Score: 0.24 depth: 13 f5 Qf4 Rf7 Bh6 Nf8 Ng5 Bxh6 Rxh6 cxd4
Bd3 Re7 Qh4 Kg7 Rh8
; 00:02:26.9 1. Score: -0.60 depth: 14 f5 Qf4 Rf7 Bh6 Nc6 Bxg7 Rxg7 Qh6 Kf8
Ng5 Nxd4 Bd3 Bb7 Qh8+ Rg8
; 00:13:22.8 1. Score: -0.38 depth: 15 f5 Qf4 Ba6 Bh6 Bxc4 Bxg7 Qe7 Rh8+
Kxg7 Qh6+ Kf7 Rh7+ Ke8 Ng5 Qxh7 Qxh7 cxd4
; 00:30:05.2 1. Score: -0.46 depth: 16 f5 Qf4 Ba6 Bh6 Bxc4 Bxg7 Qe7 Rh8+
Kxg7 Qh6+ Kf7 Rh7+ Ke8 Rxe7+ Kxe7 Nh4 Kd8 Nxg6
; 01:21:07.5 1. Score: -0.46 depth: 17 f5 Qf4 Ba6 Bh6 Bxc4 Bxg7 Qe7 Rh8+
Kxg7 Qh6+ Kf7 Rh7+ Ke8 Rxe7+ Kxe7 Nh4 Kd8 Nxg6
; Analysis completed
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.