Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:35:32 10/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2000 at 17:59:23, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >GT did consider Bb7 for about one minute after 7 minutes of thinking on my PII >333 with 28 Mb hash. The analysis was similar to Sarahs' afterward. The score >did remain negative for black however. > >GT would never "under-develope" to the extent that black did. The game is a >draw even with material superiority due to the horrible back rank situation. At >least GT tells us how "not" to play. > > >Tim Frohlick I posted the game. I do not know if gambit would get itself to the position that I posted(I think that bxc5 was too greedy and Ba6 was better but I did not analyze the game for a long time and I may be wrong). You can try to see if there is a move in the game that gambit does not like. I see that gambit understands the position better than other programs(it can at least see that f6 has negative score) It cannot see that Bb7 is good enough for black to draw but I am not sure if Bb7 is really good enough for a draw(I only know that it was probably good enough for moshe to draw and it is possible that gambit can improve the opponent's moves after Bb7) Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.