Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 17:06:22 10/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2000 at 12:43:59, Uri Blass wrote:
>On October 27, 2000 at 12:35:28, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>
>>On October 27, 2000 at 12:23:35, Marcus Kaestner wrote:
>>
>>>>Gandalf suffered from a learning bug and lost the same opening twice against
>>>>Junior because the learning is destroyed.
>>>>I believe that the same happened against other programs.
>>>>
>>>>I think that the real ssdf rating of gandalf should be better because the bug
>>>>was corrected and I understood that the bug appears only when you stop games
>>>>played by the autoplayer and is not relevant for the customer.
>>>>
>>>>I do not say that it is better than Fritz6a but I believe that it is better than
>>>>the rating that it got.
>>>
>>>
>>>more important: gandalf wins very much from fast computers. ALL the testers i
>>>know have the same results: on a 1 ghz machine with game in one hour, gandalf is
>>>slightly behind fritz6a.
>>
>>The 40:2 of the SSDF on AMD 450s is slower than Game/60 on a 1 Ghz machine, and
>>their rating for Gandalf was much lower than "slightly behind F6a."
>>
>>Enrique
>
>Their results are not convincing because gandalf suffered from a learning bug.
>
>I am interested to know the rating if you do not include losses of gandalf
>because of the learning bug.
>
>It is possible that it is only slightly behind F6a without the learning bug.
>
>Uri
Then the same calculation should be applied to Tiger 12.0 which lost 12
(twelve!) times the same game against Junior6.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.