Author: pavel
Date: 02:12:42 10/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 2000 at 09:37:33, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On October 29, 2000 at 07:38:49, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>I wonder what percentage of the moves where predicted using Deep Fritz and >>Gambit Tiger Betas Mr Enrique? > >Does Nimzo 7.32 play more like a top GM than Fritz 6a? I was amazed to find out >that my Nimzo 7.32 guessed more of Kasparov and Kramnik moves than my Fritz 6a, >it could be that Nimzo was programmed to play more like a top GM than Fritz 6a >or any other programs, but I just finished replaying the last two games using >both of these programs where Nimzo 7.32 guessed 3 more moves than fritz 6a did. > >>Pichard. >> >>http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?135383 I think it would be nice and helpfull for everyone if you would stop saying what you 'like' to say and start 'showing' what you have to say..... ie, give us the moves that nimzo7.32 predicts that fritz6a doesnt. I have no reasons to believe (unless you can prove with given moves) that nimzo7.32 plays more like a GM than fritz6 does.......to me both plays like a computer. If you would name programs like 'gandalf', 'cstal', 'gambittiger', then I would probably be interested. Pavel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.