Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:31:46 10/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 30, 2000 at 02:10:25, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On October 29, 2000 at 19:17:52, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>All that I read is excuses after excuses from all of you, I mentioned it before >>the match began that every great Chess players of the past have their time of >>prime and their time to step down and Kasparov just like all the others from the >>past is not an exception. Let celebrate and give credit to the talented >>young chess star Kramnik, Anand could have done the same back in New York, but >>he didn't have the will power and determination that Kramnik posesses. > >You just stated the obvious fact that Kasparov will lose his 'title' at some >point. That's hardly what I would call giving credit to Kramnik. Now you're even >involving Anand as well in your world of fiction. > >Mogens. What you call FICTION seems pretty right statement for me. Jorge is IMO right with what he says. Kasparov had his time, no doubt about, but this time was over... only that some people did not recognize it. Problem with Anand was that he cannot really KILL somebody or something. He has not the will to finish the thing, even if he knows it is chess and he is playing for ages... kramnik has no problem to bite. and kasparov knows it. he is afraid. and therefore he plays silly draws. I am sure he is copletely down concerning psychy. If he loses, he will cry on his hotem room. like a child. You call that fiction, but only because you have no idea about humans, or ?!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.