Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:05:46 10/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 30, 2000 at 07:14:42, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On October 30, 2000 at 05:31:46, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>What you call FICTION seems pretty right statement for me. >>Jorge is IMO right with what he says. Kasparov had his time, no doubt about, >>but this time was over... only that some people did not recognize it. >>Problem with Anand was that he cannot really KILL somebody or something. >>He has not the will to finish the thing, even if he knows it is chess >>and he is playing for ages... kramnik has no problem to bite. and kasparov >>knows it. he is afraid. and therefore he plays silly draws. >>I am sure he is copletely down concerning psychy. If he loses, >>he will cry on his hotem room. like a child. > >Pure speculation without a shred of lucid argumentation from start to finish. >Quite an achievement. >>You call that fiction, but only because you have no idea about humans, or ?! >That's the problem, I actually do. what made you come to the idea ?! >Mogens. Show me ONE fact that is in YOUR response that is no as speculative as it is in my statement. you criticize something, by doing the same thing yourself. all you do is, you offend people. you are in no way any better. you show no facts. only you offend by calling other peoples statements : "fiction", "Pure speculation without a shred of lucid argumentation from start to finish", ... that is very senseless. if you don`t present FACTS or data on your own, you cannot critisize other people not doing it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.