Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 07:33:35 10/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 30, 2000 at 10:05:46, Thorsten Czub wrote: >Show me ONE fact that is in YOUR response that is no as speculative as >it is in my statement. you criticize something, by doing the same thing >yourself. So I should present fact in order to refute your wild speculations? I don't think that is necessary. There were to issues; whether Jorge was right in his prediction and the claim about Anand. The first issue is rather easy as any great chess player loses his crown at some point. Saying that it might be now hardly constitutes a confident prediction and something you can repeat until "proven" right. The Anand claim is too silly to be contemplated at all as he himself has proven since then. I see no reason to insult the abilities of Kasparov or the ambitions of Anand in one single post based on pure speculation. These are the "facts". >all you do is, you offend people. You are a troll. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.