Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 22:03:47 10/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2000 at 00:18:55, Chessfun wrote: >On October 30, 2000 at 21:30:09, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>I think that your "I will noplay you if you don't read my finger notes" policy >>is really nasty. I have the following suggestion is you want to avoid some >>obvious conflicts: >> >> >>I think this would solve many of your problems without any need to resort to >>finger-note threats or a list of hoops that your opponent needs to jump through >>in order to play your account. >> >>I just went and checked to see what Crafty has been doing recently, and it has >>been idle for 44 minutes. It has played four games in the past eight hours. It >>has played seven games so far today and it played eight yesterday. >> >>It doesn't seem that you need to worry that much about people hogging it. If >>Crafty has been idle for 45 minutes, why not play against a Tiger? > > >Bruce all this now seems to conflict to a post you made a while back when I made >statements about Dr. Hyatts finger notes and variables. You in fact said >something to the effect that I was complaining based on the complaints of >others. > >These remarks are nothing less than the almost exact statements I made at that >time. Only this time it appears your jumping on the bandwagon. > >Sarah. I'm not big on jumping on bandwagons, and if someone wants to accuse me of being inconsistent, I don't care at all. It's exhausting to try to be perfect, and I have no interest in expending the effort. Bob is managing a shared resource and I had some opinions about how he could increase throughput without inconveniencing high-priority customers, since he seems to have some excess bandwidth. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.