Author: Uri Blass
Date: 23:56:11 10/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2000 at 02:30:59, Garry Evans wrote: >On October 31, 2000 at 02:01:02, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 31, 2000 at 00:57:31, Garry Evans wrote: >> >>> >>> Rebel Century is an excellent Program and an obvious improvement over it's >>>predeccesor. I am a little surprised however that it does not find the winning >>>line in Annand Rebel 1998. Here is the Position >>> >>> >>> r4k1/p4ppp/3P3q/4P2P/3b1P2/1r6/pPQ3B1/K1B2R2 b - - id Anand,V - Rebel10 (exp); >>>bm d4b2; >>> >>>After 3 mins on my K62-500 Rebel still refuses to find Qe6!! In my uneducated >>>view this demonstrates rebel has not been greatly inproved in the Tactical >>>arena, although it is very clear it is improved positionally. >> >>This is the wrong position. >> > >NO this is the right position I copied it to Junior and it gives the following diagram r4k2/p4ppp/3P3q/4P2P/3b1P2/1r6/pPQ3B1/K1B2R2 b - - 0 1 You can see that the first line is different You wrote 4rk1 and fritz translated it to 4rk2 I guess that the right position is 14k1 that means this. [D]1r4k1/p4ppp/3P3q/4P2P/3b1P2/1r6/pPQ3B1/K1B2R2 b - - 0 1 I also think that saying that Rebel is not better in tactics because of the fact that it cannot find it is wrong because the difference between Qe6 and Bxb2+ is only a positional difference. I read that the main difference between the new Rebel and the old Rebel is tactics. I think that you should try more positions before deciding that Rebel is not better in tactics. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.