Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:57:31 10/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2000 at 04:01:23, Paulo Soares wrote: <snipped> >Just an attempt to analyze the position after 1... f6. The move 6. Ke7 were not >analyzed. >I think that 1...Bb7!?, proposed by Tim Frolick, deserves to be analyzed. Bb7 is not the move proposed by Tim but the move that was played in the game. I will look at your analysis. There are also other lines to analyze like g5 instead of Qe7 and I know that moshe analyzed it and saved the line Bxg7 Kxg7 exf6+ Rxf6 Bd3 Rf5 Be4 c6 Kf1 Qd8 Bxf5 exf5 Rh5. There are alternatives to analyze like Qg8 instead of Rf5 but moshe did not save all the analysis. If it was my game then I would prefer to analyze Bb7 and not to investigate the question if f6 is losing because it is clear that black has problems after f6 and Bb7 is a logical move to trade the white knight that is one of the reasons for the trouble for black. out of topic:The final of the israli chamionship begins in 10.11.2000 I have to play against 8 opponents when one of them is the female world champion in correspondence games luba kristol. I got the announcement about the players that I have to play against them today. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.