Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:48:03 11/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2000 at 07:04:12, Jouni Uski wrote: >On November 01, 2000 at 06:56:27, Chessfun wrote: > >>Current completed match scores; >>Gambit 1.0 +13 -11 =16 >>Fritz 6a +11 -13 =16 >> >>Tiger 13.0 +14 -11 =15 >>Fritz 6a +11 -14 =15 >> >>Tiger 13.0 +20 -7 =13 >>Hiarcs 7.32 +7 -20 =13 >> >>Gambit 1.0 +17 -7 =16 >>Hiarcs 7.32 +7 -17 =16 >> >>Fritz 6a +18 -10 =12 >>Hiarcs 7.32 +10 -18 =12 >> >>Gambit 1.0 +12 -8 =20 >>Tiger 13.0 +8 -12 =20 >> >>Tiger 13.0 +20 -11 =9 >>Junior 6a +11 -20 =9 >> >>Gambit 1.0 +18 -14 =8 >>Junior 6a +14 -18 =8 >> >>Junior 6a +10 -20 =10 >>Fritz 6a +20 -10 =10 >> >>Junior 6a +11 -17 =12 >>Hiarcs 7.32 +17 -11 =12 >> >>Gambit 1.0 +16 -10 =14 >>Shredder 4.0 +10 -16 =14 >> >>Tiger 13.0 +16 -10 =14 >>Shredder 4.0 +10 -16 =14 >> >>Fritz 6a +22 -10 =8 >>Shredder 4.0 +10 -22 =8 >> >>Hiarcs 7.32 +13 -13 =14 >>Shredder 4.0 +13 -13 =14 >> >>Junior 6a +14 -9 =17 >>Shredder 4.0 +9 -14 =17 >> >>Next; >>Gandalf 432f >>Tiger 13.0 >> >>This match won't start till tonight as I have to set Gandalf >>up in winboard and haven't tried it yet. >> >>Current >>Tiger 13.0 113.5/200 >>Gambit 1.0 113.0/200 >>Fritz 6a 112.5/200 > >I have got impression, that Tiger/Gambit are superior to Fritz6a. But this >isn't indicating it at all. > >Jouni These results sugesst that tiger is superior by 3 elo. I also read at the rebel site that they claim that the new tiger is 50-70 elo stronger than the previous tiger and it does not suggest a big difference between tiger and Fritz6a. I do not remember the exact difference in rating between tiger12 and Fritz6a but 50-70 elo is close to the truth. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.