Author: Ernst A. Heinz
Date: 10:35:39 11/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
>I am going to run this experiment myself one of these days, just to get a hard >number for myself. 20-30% seems too low, IMHO, unless the test positions are >tactical and easy, like WAC. If you find the right move quickly, then of course >you search the optimal tree (or nearly so). The right test is a series of >consecutive positions from a game, without a clearly "right" move. Tony's figure summarizes the results on all BK positions. Please also remember that these numbers always compare "PVS + good move ordering" vs. "critical alpha-beta tree" for fixed-depth searches of uniform path length. So, we essentially measure the effectiveness of PVS combined with good move-ordering schemes as opposed to the bare quality of the move ordering in isolation. =Ernst=
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.