Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 1. ChessTiger 10; 2. ChessMaster 8.5; 3. Fritz 8.0; 4. Nimzo 7.0;

Author: Eelco de Groot

Date: 11:13:05 11/01/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 01, 2000 at 06:12:05, stuart taylor wrote:

>On October 31, 2000 at 21:12:05, Eelco de Groot wrote:
>
>>http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/thstorm/
>>
>>Four amateurs behind these first four professional programs still ended in front
>>of Diep which is not such a weak program, so yes I think it was a strong
>>championship.
>>
>>Regards, Eelco
>
>OK, but not strong enough for a next generation program to be proud of winning.
>Proud that his program looks up to standard, maybe, but not in anyway indicating
>that it might be the best of this upcoming generation, or even one of the best.
>S.Taylor

Chess Tiger only made two draws and won the rest of its games. How good a result
would you want to see as an indication that Chess Tiger is one of the strongest
of the new generation of programs? All programs in this tournament were new, and
not yet released versions when you talk about the commercial programs
participating.

Regards, Eelco



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.