Author: Amir Ban
Date: 00:34:28 01/03/98
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 1998 at 02:37:13, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On January 03, 1998 at 01:55:11, Amir Ban wrote: > >>Huh ? Your PV at ply 7 shows black a rook up, yet -2.87 down ? Looks >>like you evaluate the two passed pawns as worth almost a queen, unless I >>am missing something. Of course, you had to do that to solve WAC #2. >>It's quite correct in this position, and maybe the only way to handle >>it. This would be very risky if applied too generally. What is the >>formulation ? > >Bob is very speculative about passed pawn evaluation, but you don't need >to do this to solve Wac 2 in reasonable time. > >bruce Agreed, but WAC 2 is child's play compared to this Comet position, and Bob's heuristic really pays here. I'm impressed. I handle such positions with searching, and have to take some bad failures sometimes. I'm not the only one I'm sure. Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.