Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 14:24:46 11/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
>Hi Peter, > Were you a beta tester for Gandalf?. >Something don't seem right, if those scores were correct they >would have also been noted by the Gandalf testers and reported. > >Even the scores e v f at all time controls suggest that e is probably >150 ELO better. Maybe some of the Gandalf testers could address the >question as it seems highly unlikely that e could have been that much >better. > >Sarah. Yes I was a tester of Gandalf. The scores are correct, and these games were mostly played _after_ I was no longer a beta tester. I believe the scores were so lop sided as Gandalf 4.32e uses a different book than the F version, and I believe it is a better book. That is to say tha the E version could be equally strong, but the book is better. I also believe that the E version uses time management better. To be honest, I felt the C version was strongest, but had trouble with time management, and lost quite a few games due to having little time, and losing in the endgame.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.