Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The overall performance of Gandalf 4.32 f is 2545 too low !

Author: Peter Skinner

Date: 14:42:26 11/01/00

Go up one level in this thread


>unless the results (or similar results) are confirmed by several others, who
>have messed with 4.32e too, I wuold'nt even drop my pants ;)
>
>Pavel

These are personal games for my own benefit. There have been testers of Rebel
Tiger II that posted games, that on similiar hardware I could not reproduce.

This does not mean my results are false, nor would their's be, it could just be
one person had better results than others.

Perfect example was some of the Rebel Tiger 12.0e users on ICC. Most were
running on equal Mhz value computers, yet most times there was large gaps in
rating, even though they were all beating but on the same Crafty clones, and
other computers. I remember LeTiger(C) was leaps and bounds ahead of the other
Tiger clones, and none could reproduce it's results.

The only thing I changed my my matches were the hash table settings. All boths
ran with default settings, and default books.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.