Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 14:59:27 11/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
>>You can see the "e" version destroyed Fritz 6a, and actually was the strongest >>version over ICS play as well. My question is why wasn't it the commercial >>version? > >Your results suggest that 4.32e is more than 100 elo better than 4.32f at all >time controls and even more than 200 elo better than 4.32e at 40/40. > >They suggest that 4.32f is 125 elo better than Fritz6a. > >If you are right then the only reason that I can find not to sell 4.32e is if >the programmer want to use it to win a correspondence championship but the first >thing to suspect is that something is wrong with your results(maybe Fritz has a >bug that tells it to play weaker only in eng-eng matches against Gandalf4.32e >and maybe the machine that you used for 4.32f had problems and 4.32f was slowed >by a significant factor) > >Uri I own both versions, yet I continue to use the E version online at FICS. The reason? I think it is the better version. There could be something wrong with Fritz in the games. That is a possibility, but I see nothing wrong with it, when I use it online at FICS. So doubtful. I can not explain the results, nor do I want them taken as if they are the only results that matter. These are the results I attained. I was given the F version as a gift. The CD seems fine. It's play seems fine. In all honesty, I do feel that E was the better version. Do you have the E version to test with?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.