Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:26:43 11/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2000 at 17:16:54, Peter Berger wrote: >Sorry to butt in ! > >He gave his reason a few posts ago . > >He politely asked you to take "LeTiger" off crafty's censor list now as he >thinks in the past his account played some most interesting games against yours >and he would like to play some more again . > >He also explained to someone else when being critizised he didn't know another >way to ask . > >In another post he suggested his playing crafty too much ( finger notes policy ) >was done by accident . > >It is for sure your business if you want to do that or not but I thought judging >from your post you might have missed his question and his reasoning. > >pete ( being in helpful mood ) I didn't miss his question, as we had already talked via email. But several seem to think that my policy of not wanting to play unlimited matches vs computers is wrong. Ditto for my formula restricting the kind of blitz games I play. etc. IE right now, I am wearing a pair of Lee jeans. If someone doesn't like that, tough. They are free to wear what they want, I am free to do the same. This is getting overlooked for reasons I don't understand. Several computers on ICC say "no craftys please." Doesn't aggravate me at all, doesn't insult me, doesn't make me mad, doesn't make me want to query them in public to find out why. They just said "Don't pee on my front lawn." I don't know (or care) why. I just won't do it. IE this would be in the same neighborhood as my telling Ed "Hey Ed, I know you are autotesting all the time. I insist that you autotest against Crafty and send me the games." I don't see why I could tell him who to play against. It _is_ his program he is testing. Same for me...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.