Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 19:50:20 11/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2000 at 21:54:20, pavel wrote: >On November 01, 2000 at 17:42:26, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>>unless the results (or similar results) are confirmed by several others, who >>>have messed with 4.32e too, I wuold'nt even drop my pants ;) >>> >>>Pavel >> >>These are personal games for my own benefit. There have been testers of Rebel >>Tiger II that posted games, that on similiar hardware I could not reproduce. >> >>This does not mean my results are false, nor would their's be, it could just be >>one person had better results than others. > >I am not saying that your results are false, but it is too complicated. How >often do you see one version of a program beating a differant version of the >same program, and yet not get enough coverage? >it's unussual, and needs confirmation from more than one person.... > >Pavel Agree, I would like someone that has both the E and F versions of Gandalf to run a similiar test, using the "default" books for the two versions. As I have them separated, this was easy not to confuse the books.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.