Author: Derek Bingley
Date: 05:16:58 11/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2000 at 03:02:27, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On November 01, 2000 at 19:24:06, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On November 01, 2000 at 15:41:39, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>BTW I 100% agree with Bruce. Are we going to see a whole thread starting after >>>every move in the K-K match? >>> >>>Am I the only one to find this abusive and totally off-topic? >>> >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >>What makes you think that following the games Kasparov-Kramnik with chess >>programs, comparing their PVs and looking at how they understand the positions >>and why is off topic? If one of KC commentators is Deep Junior and the evals of >>Fritz are posted on the Braingames site move by move, I don't see why similar >>postings would be out of place in a computer-chess forum. You may find them >>boring and escape from them, as I do with your thread about the Palm thing, but >>off topic are certainly not. >> >>Enrique > >Here was the content of the original post: > >"go kaspy go 18... bxc5 m idea week pawn c4 m head". > >Here was another one: > >"kaspy did it he did Qb7 and b5 i said i m happy myidea" > >And another one: > >"i thik Kramnik must go Ne3 only Bish e3 is blocker kramnik mov tyed" > >I don't think you are talking about the same thing that Enrique is. > >bruce And? Your point is what? Semi-illiterate or dyslexic the examples may be but the analysis is good. >"go kaspy go 18... bxc5 m idea week pawn c4 m head". ======= turned out to be correct move prediction and the weak pawn was critical to the game. >"kaspy did it he did Qb7 and b5 i said i m happy myidea" ====== played predicted moves - and suggested plan, which was executed by Kasparov. >"i thik Kramnik must go Ne3 only Bish e3 is blocker kramnik mov tyed" ======= referred to Kramnik's position being tied up, the desirability of getting the knight to e3. Kramnik unravelled and played the knight to e3. To date the K-K matches have been 'chatted' over in depth. Enrique played a major part. Chats consisted of posts of computer analysis, human observations, "go Kasparov" comments and so on. Meon Hall did the same, not many people talked to him (her?), he (she) was then attacked by a moderator which appeared to give the green light for a mob to abuse and mock him (her) later. The fact that your (Bruce's) criticisms are at an intellectual level does not really distinguish them in effect from the criticisms of the mob. all imo, of course. Kind regards, Derek Bingley (2100 Rating)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.