Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:53:10 11/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2000 at 08:16:58, Derek Bingley wrote: >On November 02, 2000 at 03:02:27, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On November 01, 2000 at 19:24:06, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>On November 01, 2000 at 15:41:39, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> >>>>BTW I 100% agree with Bruce. Are we going to see a whole thread starting after >>>>every move in the K-K match? >>>> >>>>Am I the only one to find this abusive and totally off-topic? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Christophe >>> >>>What makes you think that following the games Kasparov-Kramnik with chess >>>programs, comparing their PVs and looking at how they understand the positions >>>and why is off topic? If one of KC commentators is Deep Junior and the evals of >>>Fritz are posted on the Braingames site move by move, I don't see why similar >>>postings would be out of place in a computer-chess forum. You may find them >>>boring and escape from them, as I do with your thread about the Palm thing, but >>>off topic are certainly not. >>> >>>Enrique >> >>Here was the content of the original post: >> >>"go kaspy go 18... bxc5 m idea week pawn c4 m head". >> >>Here was another one: >> >>"kaspy did it he did Qb7 and b5 i said i m happy myidea" >> >>And another one: >> >>"i thik Kramnik must go Ne3 only Bish e3 is blocker kramnik mov tyed" >> >>I don't think you are talking about the same thing that Enrique is. >> >>bruce > >And? Your point is what? > >Semi-illiterate or dyslexic the examples may be but the analysis is good. > >>"go kaspy go 18... bxc5 m idea week pawn c4 m head". ======= turned out to be correct move prediction and the weak pawn was critical to the game. > >>"kaspy did it he did Qb7 and b5 i said i m happy myidea" ====== played predicted moves - and suggested plan, which was executed by Kasparov. > >>"i thik Kramnik must go Ne3 only Bish e3 is blocker kramnik mov tyed" ======= referred to Kramnik's position being tied up, the desirability of getting the knight to e3. Kramnik unravelled and played the knight to e3. > >To date the K-K matches have been 'chatted' over in depth. Enrique played a >major part. Chats consisted of posts of computer analysis, human observations, >"go Kasparov" comments and so on. > >Meon Hall did the same, not many people talked to him (her?), he (she) was then >attacked by a moderator which appeared to give the green light for a mob to >abuse and mock him (her) later. He/she was _not_ attacked by a moderator. _I_ told him/her to (a) stop the broken English nonsense. And nonsense it was. I'm pretty sure I know who posted it, and will be happy to say so if you want. If that is an attack, then you have a different definition of attack than I do. > >The fact that your (Bruce's) criticisms are at an intellectual level does not >really distinguish them in effect from the criticisms of the mob. all imo, of >course. > >Kind regards, > > >Derek Bingley (2100 Rating)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.