Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:58:01 11/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2000 at 12:37:35, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >On November 02, 2000 at 01:14:36, Chessfun wrote: > >>On November 02, 2000 at 00:35:14, pavel wrote: >> >>>On November 01 >>>> >>>> >>>>Current >>>>Tiger 13.0 138.5/240 >>>>Gambit 1.0 113.0/200 >>>>Fritz 6a 112.5/200 >>>>Junior 6a 88.0/200 >>>>Hiarcs 7.32 87.5/200 >>>>Shredder 4.0 85.5/200 >>>>Gandalf 432f 15.0/40 >>>>Nimzo 8 0/0 >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>>nice results, >>>but what I dont understand is that you are using such 'fine' and interesting >>>programs and have two computers, dont you think its better to spend the >>>resources and time on something more interesting? (ie, long time control games). >> >> >>Typically if you look at the games on my website I use longer time controls. >>It is much more rare for me to play a tourney at these time controls. >>I choose 5 3 as it seems to be the most popular internet time control plus with >>moving I wasn't happy about starting a long time control tourney first. >>As I said in my first post on this tourney, at the conclusion of 5 3 I will run >>a 40/40 and as I repeated yesterday I think it will be 10 rounds. >> >>Also any number of things are of interest, there are some computer users that >>only use there programs at blitz time controls. And to be honest I run my >>tourneys for the sole enjoyment of myself alone, I post here simply to allow >>others if they are interested to comment and or share knowledge. I was going to >>stop posting the scores of this current 5 3 as it seems to be of little interest >>to others at the present time, although for myself it has interest as I like to >>compare blitz results to standard to see if there are any relationships. >> >>Sarah. > >Sarah, please do not stop posting I am very interested in your results as well >as others I think. >Thanks >Wayne
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.