Author: Derek Bingley
Date: 10:07:04 11/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2000 at 10:55:29, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 02, 2000 at 10:36:12, Derek Bingley wrote: > >>On November 02, 2000 at 10:16:00, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On November 02, 2000 at 06:04:12, Derek Bingley wrote: >>> >>>>On November 02, 2000 at 01:01:21, David Beauregard wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 02, 2000 at 00:47:39, pavel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 02, 2000 at 00:41:42, David Beauregard wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On November 02, 2000 at 00:39:24, pavel wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On November 02, 2000 at 00:26:47, David Beauregard wrote: >>>>>>>><snip> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You can either play me or not. You decide. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>David Beauregard >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>wow BOB, you have a choice between 'life' and 'death' >>>>>>>>chose...hurry!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Pavel >>>>>>> >>>>>>>To Pavel: chess is life or death and maybe some of you should realize it is >>>>>>>just a game..... >>>>>> >>>>>>I just realized.... >>>>>> >>>>>>do you also have an account in FICS? >>>>>> >>>>>>Pavel >>>>> >>>>>To Pavel: I meant to say that chess is NOT life or death and maybe some of you >>>>>should realize it is just a game. I asked Mr Hyatt in a very cordial manner to >>>>>rethink his policy of noplaying and censoring LeTiger. That is all. >>>> >>>>David, >>>> >>>>Writing as a lurker here for a little while I would like to express my sympathy >>>>with you. Perfectly well written, non-rude, well-argued or even polite requests >>>>which are seen as even marginally critical of certain people here are routinely >>>>met with summary rudeness as if this was the most natural response in the world. >>>>Once the rude lead has been given there is then a tendency for a mob with >>>>unknown names and common agenda to then jump all over the original posting >>>>'offender' as if it entirely natural, their right and they 'own the place'. With >>>>observation over time it appears that posters capable of making knowledgeable >>>>posts just leave, or restrict their posting to the occasional hostile complaint >>>>or flame. Slowly the whole thing just degenerates. Time for a new forum or >>>>return to rgcc. This one doesn't work anymore. >>>> >>>>Kind regards, >>>> >>>>Derek Bingley (2100 Rating) >>>> >>> >>>Or you _could_ return to your own chess forum. I'm sure it is working quite >>>well since you set it up and control it? >>> >>> >> >>I don't have a chess forum, thank you very much. >> >>I have absolutely no connection with any commercial site, non-commercial site, >>chess program, chess shop, chess company, chess forum, university department or >>anything else. >> >>Kind regards, >> >> >>Derek Bingley (2100 Rating) >> > > >Right. I haven't written any chess programs, either... > If you would like to question the truth of the statements: >>I don't have a chess forum, thank you very much. >> >>I have absolutely no connection with any commercial site, non-commercial site, >>chess program, chess shop, chess company, chess forum, university department or >>anything else. would you like to commit to a wager of, say, $10,000? I'll give you the address of a suitable licenced attorney where you can deposit the funds. Then I'll provide you the proof. "anything else" means, for these purposes, a commercial connection in computer chess. "university department" for these purposes means one that has a computer chess involvement. Kind regards, Derek Bingley > > >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I did not >>>>>like Andreas answer because I thought it was a vulgar message. I will refrain >>>>>from asking Professor Hyatt again to play crafty. Thanks for all the courtesy >>>>>extended by Mr Hyatt, Andreas and Pavel.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.