Author: Derek Bingley
Date: 10:13:29 11/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2000 at 10:53:10, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 02, 2000 at 08:16:58, Derek Bingley wrote: > >>On November 02, 2000 at 03:02:27, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On November 01, 2000 at 19:24:06, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>>On November 01, 2000 at 15:41:39, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>> >>>>>BTW I 100% agree with Bruce. Are we going to see a whole thread starting after >>>>>every move in the K-K match? >>>>> >>>>>Am I the only one to find this abusive and totally off-topic? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Christophe >>>> >>>>What makes you think that following the games Kasparov-Kramnik with chess >>>>programs, comparing their PVs and looking at how they understand the positions >>>>and why is off topic? If one of KC commentators is Deep Junior and the evals of >>>>Fritz are posted on the Braingames site move by move, I don't see why similar >>>>postings would be out of place in a computer-chess forum. You may find them >>>>boring and escape from them, as I do with your thread about the Palm thing, but >>>>off topic are certainly not. >>>> >>>>Enrique >>> >>>Here was the content of the original post: >>> >>>"go kaspy go 18... bxc5 m idea week pawn c4 m head". >>> >>>Here was another one: >>> >>>"kaspy did it he did Qb7 and b5 i said i m happy myidea" >>> >>>And another one: >>> >>>"i thik Kramnik must go Ne3 only Bish e3 is blocker kramnik mov tyed" >>> >>>I don't think you are talking about the same thing that Enrique is. >>> >>>bruce >> >>And? Your point is what? >> >>Semi-illiterate or dyslexic the examples may be but the analysis is good. >> >>>"go kaspy go 18... bxc5 m idea week pawn c4 m head". ======= turned out to be correct move prediction and the weak pawn was critical to the game. >> >>>"kaspy did it he did Qb7 and b5 i said i m happy myidea" ====== played predicted moves - and suggested plan, which was executed by Kasparov. >> >>>"i thik Kramnik must go Ne3 only Bish e3 is blocker kramnik mov tyed" ======= referred to Kramnik's position being tied up, the desirability of getting the knight to e3. Kramnik unravelled and played the knight to e3. >> >>To date the K-K matches have been 'chatted' over in depth. Enrique played a >>major part. Chats consisted of posts of computer analysis, human observations, >>"go Kasparov" comments and so on. >> >>Meon Hall did the same, not many people talked to him (her?), he (she) was then >>attacked by a moderator which appeared to give the green light for a mob to >>abuse and mock him (her) later. > >He/she was _not_ attacked by a moderator. I didn't say it was you. Kind regards, Derek Bingley _I_ told him/her to (a) stop the >broken English nonsense. And nonsense it was. I'm pretty sure I know who >posted it, and will be happy to say so if you want. If that is an attack, >then you have a different definition of attack than I do. > >> >>The fact that your (Bruce's) criticisms are at an intellectual level does not >>really distinguish them in effect from the criticisms of the mob. all imo, of >>course. >> >>Kind regards, >> >> >>Derek Bingley (2100 Rating)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.