Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: have gambit-tiger1.0 versus Gandalf4.32f on the autoplayer

Author: Enrique Irazoqui

Date: 11:07:38 11/02/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 02, 2000 at 13:52:18, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On November 02, 2000 at 10:11:31, pavel wrote:
>>firts of all, to make things clear, I am not one of the greatest fans of
>>gandalf.
>
>i like gandalf. and steen and dan.
>
>>secondly, I could'nt care less about what's crafty's overall performance against
>>gambit tiger.
>
>?!?
>
>>I am sure gambit tiger is a fine program, and I really do expect to buy it soon.
>
>yes.
>
>
>>but dont you think you are "over-doing" things too much?
>
>?!? what shall i do when i get a 5-0 ?
>NOT post it ?!
>sorry. there is no praise in results, or ?
>results are simple data.
>bean counting.
>
>
>
>>too much praise may backfire (ie, gandalf beta-testers), as the consumers will
>>have too much expectations too.
>
>?! gambit-tiger is a killer.
>
>
>>ever heard of the concept, "diminishing returns"?
>
>pah - it kills shredder4, it kills gandalf, kills crafty,
>it will kill others too.

It also "kills" Nimzo 7.32 and Goliath light. But it doesn't "kill" Junior 6a
and Hiarcs 7.32. It doesn't "kill" Tiger 13 and Deep Fritz beta either. That's a
more complete account.

>i am not afraid.

That's a man! :)

Enrique



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.