Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I agree(nt)

Author: Jorge

Date: 14:15:47 11/02/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 02, 2000 at 12:58:01, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 02, 2000 at 12:37:35, Wayne Lowrance wrote:
>
>>On November 02, 2000 at 01:14:36, Chessfun wrote:
>>
>>>On November 02, 2000 at 00:35:14, pavel wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 01
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Current
>>>>>Tiger 13.0      138.5/240
>>>>>Gambit 1.0      113.0/200
>>>>>Fritz 6a        112.5/200
>>>>>Junior 6a        88.0/200
>>>>>Hiarcs 7.32      87.5/200
>>>>>Shredder 4.0     85.5/200
>>>>>Gandalf 432f     15.0/40
>>>>>Nimzo 8             0/0
>>>>>
>>>>>Sarah.
>>>>
>>>>nice results,
>>>>but what I dont understand is that you are using such 'fine' and interesting
>>>>programs and have two computers, dont you think its better to spend the
>>>>resources and time on something more interesting? (ie, long time control games).
>>>
>>>
>>>Typically if you look at the games on my website I use longer time controls.
>>>It is much more rare for me to play a tourney at these time controls.
>>>I choose 5 3 as it seems to be the most popular internet time control plus with
>>>moving I wasn't happy about starting a long time control tourney first.
>>>As I said in my first post on this tourney, at the conclusion of 5 3 I will run
>>>a 40/40 and as I repeated yesterday I think it will be 10 rounds.
>>>
>>>Also any number of things are of interest, there are some computer users that
>>>only use there programs at blitz time controls. And to be honest I run my
>>>tourneys for the sole enjoyment of myself alone, I post here simply to allow
>>>others if they are interested to comment and or share knowledge. I was going to
>>>stop posting the scores of this current 5 3 as it seems to be of little interest
>>>to others at the present time, although for myself it has interest as I like to
>>>compare blitz results to standard to see if there are any relationships.
>>>
>>>Sarah.
>>
>>Sarah, please do not stop posting I am very interested in your results as well
>>as others I think.
>>Thanks
>>Wayne

This is the kind of postings I always like to see.  Tournaments between great
programs, such as these.  I tend to like shorter time controls better (< 60
mins.)between games, simply because I find them interesting. Thanks for the
results, and I hope you'll keep us updated.

Jorge :P



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.