Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 19:38:28 11/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2000 at 14:35:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: >Thorsten thinks it is much more than that. IE this is a new program from the >ground up. He is mistaken. do you have more to present than hear-said data ?! i have seen many games so far. and i can tell you: you will have to "tune your evaluations " if you want to compete... :-)) let the time tell the "truth" and we can talk later again about this topic when you tried to play your own games. then we can both reevaluate our point of views... in the moment it is more speculation from your side. i can only present the games. gambit-tiger keeps trying the plan. in almost any game. thats the same thing cstal always tried. also in almost any game. both can play without saccing and without attacking. but its rare. they dont HAVE to sac or attack. but most often they do. thats part of their strength (Gambit-tiger) or weakness (CSTal). they keep on trying. that looks pretty human. they do not play as if they wait for mistakes of the opponent and then eat a pawn. they play for king-attacks and mating. i like this.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.