Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: KK R+4P vs R+3P ending.

Author: Sune Larsson

Date: 23:47:40 11/02/00

Go up one level in this thread

On November 02, 2000 at 20:08:57, Ricardo Gibert wrote:

>[D]8/1R3p2/4pkp1/7p/7P/5PP1/r7/6K1 w - - 10 46
>
>Why doesn't White play 46.f4 here?


 Yes, the position after 46.f4 is claimed by Kramnik's seconds,
 Illescas and Lautier, to be a known book draw. See Henderson report
 at TWIC. Instead Kramnik chose 46.Kf1 (? according to Henderson),
 probably because he didn't know this book draw - or got some OTB doubts.

 Sune

• Re: KK R+4P vs R+3P ending. Ricardo Gibert 00:11:29 11/03/00
  • Re: KK R+4P vs R+3P ending. Uri Blass 01:33:10 11/03/00
    • Re: KK R+4P vs R+3P ending. Ricardo Gibert 02:51:16 11/03/00
      • Re: KK R+4P vs R+3P ending. Uri Blass 06:51:56 11/03/00
        • Re: KK R+4P vs R+3P ending. Ricardo Gibert 07:51:56 11/03/00
          • Re: KK R+4P vs R+3P ending. [corrected] Ricardo Gibert 08:10:46 11/03/00
            • Re: KK R+4P vs R+3P ending. [corrected] Ricardo Gibert 20:04:18 11/03/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.