Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: LeTiger and Crafty on ICC for Mr. Hyatt and Andreas

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 09:35:25 11/03/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 03, 2000 at 11:13:35, Dan Kiski wrote:

>On November 03, 2000 at 05:51:59, Garry Evans wrote:
>
>>On November 02, 2000 at 15:07:48, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On November 02, 2000 at 05:07:36, Jerry wrote:
>>>
>>>>Why waste your time with crafty or scrappy???
>>>>Singacrafty is the same program and will play ALL other programs...
>>>>You can see craftys true rating there, not the over rated rank achieved by
>>>>noplaying those with better programs...
>>>>
>>>>Good Luck on ICC...LeTiger is a tough opponent
>>>
>>>
>>>You say I noplay those with better programs.  I challenge you to prove
>>>that statement.
>>>
>>>     attakinski  cmslim        criollo   dini    egghead  FireViper
>>>     GODMODE     gzk           inmortal  Kurios  Mr-Matt  Pietari
>>>     BarkingCow  comp          CUP98     EA6PZ   eivissa  Gatling
>>>     Good-Boy    HangerOn      Jack-Daniels      Masterchess  muhaha
>>>     twixer      brut          ComputerMan       Dementia  Eatman  ET2000
>>>     Ghostn      Gregorio      HUGES     jason-1 MasterMarc   Mungo
>>>     Wild5Crafy  CARobot       CraftyCrafty      DesX      Ebbi    Eza
>>>     GmSuperSoffer  grouchy   ibrax     JJcool        MateGoD      MysticWarrior
>>>
>>>That is the _total_ noplay list for crafty at the present moment.  You can
>>>verify this with an ICC admin if you want.
>>>
>>>Now exactly which "top programs" have I noplayed?  Most of those are computer
>>>cheaters and crafty users.  Only a very few are there for violating my finger
>>>notes.
>>>
>>>your turn.  Maybe to offer facts rather than incorrect speculation?
>>
>>
>>  Wow!! That's the longest No-play list I have ever seen, you must not be very
>>popular?
>
>I have a acount on the icc and its never had any problems playing crafty. my
>no-played list is much biger. least crafty never seeks to play computers with !
>omputer in his formula as many others do. or seek then abort if they get black
>or not play an even n# of gamz.There are lotsa acounts on the icc where the
>perator switches programs or lets the ponder go longer and so on. many deserve
>to get no-played for these resons.The namez i see listed are for the most crafty
>clones or others that do the things i named, fact many are missing from crafty
>list that i would never play.
>
>cheers
>Dan

<sarcasm>

The problem with your post is you have a _severe_ handicap compared to the
whiners.  You have real data.  You actually play on ICC.  You see the kind
of nonsense that goes on.  IE your handicap is "facts".  The others bask in
a more accurate form of knowledge known as "opinion".  And we all know that
opinion is 100% accurate.

Please don't post factual information in this thread.  It sticks out like a
sore thumb when you do.  Stick with opinions and uninformed speculation.  Then
you will blend in invisibly.

</sarcasm>

The really bad thing is that if the people on my noplay list were there simply
because I can't beat them, then I must _really_ be stupid.  Because there are
other computer accounts that beat me _far_ worse than any of the noplayed gang
ever did.  Guess I am too stupid to noplay the ones that beat me the most,
and instead choose to noplay the ones that feel that they can do what they
want, regardless of my finger notes.  I suppose PhD means "plain hard dumb".
I always wondered what it meant...

mandamus is one that comes to mind.  I don't think I have won a game in the
last 10 or so.  Dang, forgot to +noplay him.  Bruce (ferret) is another bad
case.  Forgot again.  Must be getting old.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.