Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: LCT II results K6/233 vs. Pentium 233 MMX with more hash

Author: Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com)

Date: 23:25:02 01/03/98

Go up one level in this thread

On January 03, 1998 at 17:16:50, Moritz Berger wrote:

<snip>
>
>	Prog	Fritz	Fritz	Fritz	Junior	Hiarcs	Hiarcs
>	Ver/cpu	5.01	5.01	5.01	4.6beta 6 Eng.	6 Eng.
>		P233MMX	P233MMX	K6/233	P233MMX	P233MMX	K6/233
>	Hash	98304KB	12288KB	12288KB	98304KB	98304KB	12288KB
>
<smip>
>FIN 04	...h3	1	1	68	3	24
<snip>
>P.S.: Hiarcs 6 finds FIN 04 on my machine both with 12288 and 98304 KB
>hash tables. Albert, could you verify your result for FIN 04 ???

I also have a Hiarcs 6 run that fails to find FIN 04 -
can you verify the EPD string we used (given below), too?

This was sent me by someone who ran HIARCS 6 under DOS with the
-x option and 32Mb hash on a K6 200.
The thinking time was only 269 seconds, but given your results
of solutions in 3-24 seconds with 10-100 Mb hash, that shouldn't matter.

==> Is the EPD string used (below) correct? <===

5k2/7R/4P2p/5K2/p1r2P1p/8/8/8 b - - bm h3;
id "LCTIIFIN.04";
ce   -204;
pv h5 Kg5 Ke8 f5 Rg4+ Kf6 Rg8 Rxh5 a3 Rxh4 a2 Ra4 ;
dep 10;
acs 269;
acn 8165920;

Rafowell (fowell@netcom.com, usually).

This page took 0.03 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.