Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:51:21 11/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2000 at 00:47:04, Andrew Dados wrote: >On November 04, 2000 at 00:00:04, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>>By your definition I would say that Richard Lang's programs between 1985 and >>>1992 are the all time greats. >>> >>>They are still an incredible challenge to many amateur programs. >>> >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >>I totally agree. We have benefacted from the experience of earlier acheivements, >>just as the rest of the world has. >> >>To say that today's programs are the best of all-time, is a slap in the face of >>the older generation of programs. Nothing has been proved. Today's standard are >>so much higher than they were back then. There is really no comparison. > >Most important thing is processor speed / memory sizes programs were >written/debugged and intended to run. For me all time greatest is definitely >Genius. Get a 486/33Mhz and try it against any of todays top programs. I put my >money on Genius... > >-Andrew- I suggest that you try 4 minutes/40 moves on fast hardware that is eqvivalent to 120 minutes/40 moves on 486/33Mhz. I guess that Genius is going to lose against Gambittiger or Fritz6a. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.