Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 03:10:16 11/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2000 at 03:51:21, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 04, 2000 at 00:47:04, Andrew Dados wrote: > >>On November 04, 2000 at 00:00:04, Peter Skinner wrote: >> >>>>By your definition I would say that Richard Lang's programs between 1985 and >>>>1992 are the all time greats. >>>> >>>>They are still an incredible challenge to many amateur programs. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Christophe >>> >>>I totally agree. We have benefacted from the experience of earlier acheivements, >>>just as the rest of the world has. >>> >>>To say that today's programs are the best of all-time, is a slap in the face of >>>the older generation of programs. Nothing has been proved. Today's standard are >>>so much higher than they were back then. There is really no comparison. >> >>Most important thing is processor speed / memory sizes programs were >>written/debugged and intended to run. For me all time greatest is definitely >>Genius. Get a 486/33Mhz and try it against any of todays top programs. I put my >>money on Genius... >> >>-Andrew- > >I suggest that you try 4 minutes/40 moves on fast hardware that is eqvivalent to >120 minutes/40 moves on 486/33Mhz. > >I guess that Genius is going to lose against Gambittiger or Fritz6a. > >Uri I tried it 2 or 3 years ago on equal hardware and Genius lost to the top programs of these times quite badly. I think that Genius was also one of the secret machines tested by the SSDF and came out over 100 Elo points under the top. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.