Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 08:39:40 11/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2000 at 07:42:00, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >IMO, either methods has its benefit. I understand that fail-hard is a bit faster >than fail-soft because "best" is already initialized to alpha, whereas it's "- >infinity" in fail-soft. The last word must read "fail-hard". Sorry for confusing things.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.