Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: OT: Kramnik is not the champion of anything (IMO)

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 13:11:06 11/04/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 04, 2000 at 15:20:25, Uri Blass wrote:

>I do not know if this is the case.
>Is there a proof for this statement?

I have no idea. My impression is that public interest in chess outside the
limited chess circles is declining, especially the media interest. One of the
reasons is Deep Blue and its vicory over the best human chess player. If you
want proof, make a poll.

>What is the reason that the BGN needs kasparov to survive?

BGN is a commercial venture, which depends on publicity. I merely doubt that any
chessplayer besides Kasparov has that kind of reputation and karisma to sell
tickets.

We could make a bet on how long BGN will exist?

Mogens.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.