Author: Uri Blass
Date: 21:15:50 11/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2000 at 23:40:09, Michael Cummings wrote: >On November 04, 2000 at 22:28:10, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 04, 2000 at 19:35:26, Michael Cummings wrote: >> >>>We all know why, Chessmaster, Rebel, Shredder and the like are not on the list, >>>and I can understand that. But without them the list means very little to me >>>these days. >> >>It is clear that shredder4 is number 4 in the list. >>When you download the list in dos format you can see that there is no program >>that is number 4 so it is clear that it is shredder4. >> >>Uri > >hmmm, very clear to everyone except me, if shredder 4 is number 4, then why >ain't it listed. See right now I have no idea if you are telling the truth or >being sacastic in response to what I write. If it is the truth, then its the >first I have ever heard of that. You can see the results in http://home3.swipnet.se/~w-36794/ssdf/rlwww004.txt 1)You can see that program number 4 is missing. 2)After the list of the programs there is a list of the results. You can see that Fritz6 beated program 204 26-14 if you go down to look at the list of the results. There is no other program that Fritz6 beated 26-14 3)If you download the public ssdf games you can also see that Fritz6 won Shredder4 26-14 4)204 is not in the list but other programs like 205 are in the list(205 is number 15 in the list) I learned from this facts that 204 is shredder4. The ssdf tries to hide shredder4 but if you are smart enough you have no problem to find it. I cannot find the rating of shredder4(maybe I am not smart enough) but I have no problem to find that it is number 4. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.