Author: Uri Blass
Date: 21:27:16 11/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2000 at 23:46:37, Jon Dart wrote: >Arasan doesn't see anything close to a draw after 10 minutes. >score is -4.89 and it prefered Qg4+. It searched a depth of >15 plies, 135 millon nodes. > >Crafty also didn't find it in 10 minutes (on a slightly slower >machine). It's score was around -3.40 and it also preferred >Qg4+. > >That isn't to say there is no draw, however: there sure are >a lot of checks. > >--Jon I found that my programs cannot find it in a reasonable time inspite of the fact that the result is a draw if I give them to play and I was interested to know if there is a better program. I know that lgoliath can probably see the draw but it also see draws when there is no draw and I am interested to know if there is a program that can see the draw by search. There are a lot of checks but the number of relevant positions is not more than some thousands so it is possible to see if there is a perpetual check if you use the right program. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.