Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 21:52:34 11/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 03, 2000 at 10:39:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 03, 2000 at 00:18:40, David Beauregard wrote: > >>On November 02, 2000 at 22:28:50, pavel wrote: >> >>>On November 02, 2000 at 15:07:48, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On November 02, 2000 at 05:07:36, Jerry wrote: >>>> >>>>>Why waste your time with crafty or scrappy??? >>>>>Singacrafty is the same program and will play ALL other programs... >>>>>You can see craftys true rating there, not the over rated rank achieved by >>>>>noplaying those with better programs... >>>>> >>>>>Good Luck on ICC...LeTiger is a tough opponent >>>> >>>> >>>>You say I noplay those with better programs. I challenge you to prove >>>>that statement. >>>> >>>> attakinski cmslim criollo dini egghead FireViper >>>> GODMODE gzk inmortal Kurios Mr-Matt Pietari >>>> BarkingCow comp CUP98 EA6PZ eivissa Gatling >>>> Good-Boy HangerOn Jack-Daniels Masterchess muhaha >>>> twixer brut ComputerMan Dementia Eatman ET2000 >>>> Ghostn Gregorio HUGES jason-1 MasterMarc Mungo >>>> Wild5Crafy CARobot CraftyCrafty DesX Ebbi Eza >>>> GmSuperSoffer grouchy ibrax JJcool MateGoD MysticWarrior >>>> >>>>That is the _total_ noplay list for crafty at the present moment. You can >>>>verify this with an ICC admin if you want. >>>> >>>>Now exactly which "top programs" have I noplayed? Most of those are computer >>>>cheaters and crafty users. Only a very few are there for violating my finger >>>>notes. >>>> >>>>your turn. Maybe to offer facts rather than incorrect speculation? >>> >>> >>>where is 'letiger' in your list? >>> >>>Pavel >> >>Bob, how about the following list of top programs you have no played including >>LeTiger who is still censored and noplayed. The following are top programs you >>have no played for what reason I do not know but here they are Mr. Hyatt. >> >>LeTiger, Good-Boy, CARobot, Gregorio, EA6PZ, Egghead, mystic warrior. These >>programs are top programs and can win and would win their fair share against >>Crafty if you would not hide behind your noplay and censor rules. >> >>LeTiger > > >OK... feel free to do what you want. That attitude does not earn my >admiration. I don't "hide behind" anything. I simply choose to noplay >folks that think they don't have to follow my rules. > >If you don't like my policies, all I can say is "tough". If you want to >say I hide behind my policies, fine. But don't come up with this nonsense >of hiding behind my noplay and censor list. I now remember why I censored >you in the first place. Hint: it has to do with "attitude". I don't feel >obligated to put up with nonsense. > >You have been un-noplayed for days. However, I don't care whether we play >again or not. There are _plenty_ of tiger operators on ICC that are a bit >less arrogant, and a lot more polite. I'll stick with them. What did he do? I know that I have had some trouble with operators and put them on my noplay list, but I can't remember why, in most cases. In a few cases I actually took notes, but now I can't find the notes. I've been running on Otter recently and I don't think that has much of a noplay list at all, so it has been playing some of the guys who are on your noplay list. So far, no problems. I don't know why you need to worry about these guys. If you want to get the games, but don't want the attitude, you can add something to your interface that deletes tells from them, as well as draw requests, requests for aborts, adjournments, kibitzes, and takebacks. That lets you censor them while still allowing them to play. At that point they become perfect opponents. You have a whole bunch of people who want to fight with you simultaneously. I would find it hard to manage this many fights, personally. At some point it has to become impossible to manage. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.