Author: Harald Faber
Date: 01:46:10 11/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2000 at 05:07:57, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 04, 2000 at 04:57:05, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>Why not doing a match without permanent brain on this ONE machine: >> >>cstal on 900 versus gambit-tiger on 900. >>tournament-time control 40/120 ?! >> >>that would be more interesting IMO. >> >>do you play with version cstal 2.03 ?!?! > >If Gambittiger can win on the slower machine then I do not think that 900 versus >900 will be more interesting. > >Uri :-)))) It is (c) T.Czub that Tal plays better against opponents on same hardware than against opponent on significant slower hardware. :-)))) Never heard of this joke before. :-))) I was victim of that too as I once played Shredder and some other progs on K6-200 vs. Tal/K7-500 where the worst result was a 50% score looking from Tals's opponents view. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.