Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: LCT II results K6/233 vs. Pentium 233 MMX with more hash

Author: Carsten Kossendey

Date: 10:35:29 01/04/98

Go up one level in this thread


On January 04, 1998 at 09:05:04, Moritz Berger wrote:

>On January 04, 1998 at 02:25:02, Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com)
>wrote:
>
>>On January 03, 1998 at 17:16:50, Moritz Berger wrote:
>>
>><snip>
>>>FIN 04	...h3	1	1	68	3	24
>><snip>
>>>P.S.: Hiarcs 6 finds FIN 04 on my machine both with 12288 and 98304 KB
>>>hash tables. Albert, could you verify your result for FIN 04 ???
>>
>>I also have a Hiarcs 6 run that fails to find FIN 04 -
>>can you verify the EPD string we used (given below), too?
>>
>>==> Is the EPD string used (below) correct? <===
>>
>>5k2/7R/4P2p/5K2/p1r2P1p/8/8/8 b - - bm h3;
>>id "LCTIIFIN.04";
>>ce   -204;
>>pv h5 Kg5 Ke8 f5 Rg4+ Kf6 Rg8 Rxh5 a3 Rxh4 a2 Ra4 ;
>
>The correct move ("bm") should be h5, not h3. My .CBF file I used for
>the test contains the correct key move (h5), the "...h3" move given also
>in my solution table is wrong.
>
>Moritz

WRONG. The position is from Kasparov vs. Deep Thought, New York 1990.
1...h5? is what DT played. The game went on: 2.Rxh6 a3 3.Rxh3 Ra4 4.Rh1
a2 5.Ra1 Ke7.

In post-game analysis 1...h3! was found to be the only drawing move.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.