Author: Chessfun
Date: 05:33:36 11/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2000 at 01:26:12, pavel wrote:
>On November 02, 2000 at 01:14:36, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>On November 02, 2000 at 00:35:14, pavel wrote:
>>
>>>On November 01
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Current
>>>>Tiger 13.0 138.5/240
>>>>Gambit 1.0 113.0/200
>>>>Fritz 6a 112.5/200
>>>>Junior 6a 88.0/200
>>>>Hiarcs 7.32 87.5/200
>>>>Shredder 4.0 85.5/200
>>>>Gandalf 432f 15.0/40
>>>>Nimzo 8 0/0
>>>>
>>>>Sarah.
>>>
>>>nice results,
>>>but what I dont understand is that you are using such 'fine' and interesting
>>>programs and have two computers, dont you think its better to spend the
>>>resources and time on something more interesting? (ie, long time control games).
>>
>>
>>Typically if you look at the games on my website I use longer time controls.
>
>yes that I have seen, and thats why I was surprised to see 5'3 from you.
>
>>It is much more rare for me to play a tourney at these time controls.
>>I choose 5 3 as it seems to be the most popular internet time control plus with
>>moving I wasn't happy about starting a long time control tourney first.
>>As I said in my first post on this tourney, at the conclusion of 5 3 I will run
>>a 40/40 and as I repeated yesterday I think it will be 10 rounds.
>
>thats would be just great. ;)
>
>>
>>Also any number of things are of interest, there are some computer users that
>>only use there programs at blitz time controls. And to be honest I run my
>>tourneys for the sole enjoyment of myself alone, I post here simply to allow
>>others if they are interested to comment and or share knowledge. I was going to
>>stop posting the scores of this current 5 3 as it seems to be of little interest
>>to others at the present time, although for myself it has interest as I like to
>>compare blitz results to standard to see if there are any relationships.
>
>yes, ofcourse most here plays tournaments for the sole enjoyment of themselves.
>since you are sharing the fun, my suggestion was to have something of longer
>time control.
>but I guess you are doing it anyways...
>
>>
>>Sarah.
>
>by the way, do you play your account on chess.net?
>I havent seen you there for some time..
>
>I recently got an account in FICS for the sole purpose of running 'wbxtreme'
>account= 'xtreme', I get slaughtered by the hardware disadvantage there ;(
>
>do you have any account there?
>
>Pavel
Hi Pavel,
Sorry missed this post with upgrading.
Only reason the chessnet account hasn't been used for a bit is the testing
of Rebel 11 followed by my auto232 tourney.
Don't have a FIC's account, I did once apply about 9 months ago and never
received a reply.
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.