Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:43:54 11/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2000 at 11:27:43, Christophe Theron wrote: >On November 05, 2000 at 00:27:18, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>On November 05, 2000 at 00:15:50, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 04, 2000 at 23:40:09, Michael Cummings wrote: >>> >>>>On November 04, 2000 at 22:28:10, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 04, 2000 at 19:35:26, Michael Cummings wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>We all know why, Chessmaster, Rebel, Shredder and the like are not on the list, >>>>>>and I can understand that. But without them the list means very little to me >>>>>>these days. >>>>> >>>>>It is clear that shredder4 is number 4 in the list. >>>>>When you download the list in dos format you can see that there is no program >>>>>that is number 4 so it is clear that it is shredder4. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>hmmm, very clear to everyone except me, if shredder 4 is number 4, then why >>>>ain't it listed. See right now I have no idea if you are telling the truth or >>>>being sacastic in response to what I write. If it is the truth, then its the >>>>first I have ever heard of that. >>> >>>You can see the results in >>>http://home3.swipnet.se/~w-36794/ssdf/rlwww004.txt >>> >>>1)You can see that program number 4 is missing. >>> >>>2)After the list of the programs there is a list of the results. >>>You can see that Fritz6 beated program 204 26-14 if you go down to look at the >>>list of the results. >>>There is no other program that Fritz6 beated 26-14 >>> >>>3)If you download the public ssdf games you can also see that Fritz6 won >>>Shredder4 26-14 >>> >>>4)204 is not in the list but other programs like 205 are in the list(205 is >>>number 15 in the list) >>> >>>I learned from this facts that 204 is shredder4. >>>The ssdf tries to hide shredder4 but if you are smart enough you have no problem >>>to find it. >>> >>>I cannot find the rating of shredder4(maybe I am not smart enough) but I have no >>>problem to find that it is number 4. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Ah I see, but I only ever look at the list published, never any of the fine >>details. It is stupid that it is not listed, I should not have to go looking as >>you explained to find proper details. They should just list the damn thing. >> >>Thanks for the info Uri > > > >Ossi Weiner, Millennium's director, threatened the SSDF to sue them if they >published the results of Shredder 4. > >It is indeed stupid, but it's Weiner's fault, not the SSDF's. > > > > Christophe I know that it was a decision of the ssdf. Ossi Weiner did not let them to publish the rating of other programs of the millenium package like Genius but he let them publish Shredder4's rating. The ssdf decided that if they have no right to publish the rating of other programs of the millenium then they are going to punish millenium and not to publish Shredder4's rating. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.