Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 09:45:23 11/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2000 at 11:28:58, Thorsten Czub wrote: >fritz, junior, shredder, ... do not see anything. >therefore they will lose against gambit-tiger. >they follow a paradigm that will die out. > >"Where do YOU want to go today ?" :-)) It wouldn't be too difficult to find a position where the absolute opposite is true, ie. that GT is completely clueless about the position. So it doesn't prove anything either way. With a lot of effort almost any program could be responsible for a new paradigm based on a single position. If you consider the limited differences between GT and other programs then there's nothing to support a new paradigm. At least nothing remotely revolutionary or different. The approach is interesting, but not exactly a novel idea. I prefer knowledge programs myself, but I have nothing against the so-called "bean counters". They're not mutually exclusive. Given the information posted by CT your opinions about GT's revolutionary concept simply isn't true. But I know about your allergic reaction to facts :o). Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.