Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:18:03 11/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2000 at 12:40:17, pavel wrote: >1.Rhg1 Nf6 2.h3 Bxh3 3.Kb1 Nbd7 4.Bh6 Nh5 5.Qc2 Ndf6 > ² (0.51) Depth: 9/29 00:07:55 14671kN > >(mahamood, MyTown 06.11.2000) >--------------------------------------------------------------------- gandalf4.32f says: depth 11 1/41 +0.35 Rhg1 Nf6 Bh6 ... >I think there is always one "best" (or good) moves that one program finds (or >sees) that others dont. Doesnt make "that one" better or "untouchables" than >others. of course. but i do not only present ONE position and thats all. The beta-testers of gambit-tiger came with lots of data, games, matches, examples. if gambit-tiger would only "solve" this position, without all other results, i would say: pah - ONE position. but this is not my idea, not my point. Gandalf, CSTal, Gambit-Tiger, maybe others too, are on the right way. that was my point. >I think "gambit tiger" is exceptional, but let's not exaggerate it :) i do not do this. i differenciate and i gave you another position to differenciate. you remember Rc6 ? >even christophe "HIMSELF" admited it's "just the tunning of evaluation fnction" even christophe himself (great!) said that it is a beginning. gambit-tiger has version number 1.0, older chess-tiger has version number 13. >but he also said "it's just the beginning". exactly. >so its clear that he has better, bigger plans. > >hang loose, >kick back, >relax > >Pavs ;) i am completely relaxed. but i see that my friend would not have list this email-chess game if he would have had gambit-tiger. now gandalf4.32f says depth 12 1/41 +0.27 Rhg1 Nf6 Bg5 h5 Bh6 b4 Bxg7 Kxg7 h3 bxc3 ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.