Author: Chris Taylor
Date: 10:35:46 11/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2000 at 11:27:43, Christophe Theron wrote: >On November 05, 2000 at 00:27:18, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>On November 05, 2000 at 00:15:50, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 04, 2000 at 23:40:09, Michael Cummings wrote: >>> >>>>On November 04, 2000 at 22:28:10, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 04, 2000 at 19:35:26, Michael Cummings wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>We all know why, Chessmaster, Rebel, Shredder and the like are not on the list, >>>>>>and I can understand that. But without them the list means very little to me >>>>>>these days. >>>>> >>>>>It is clear that shredder4 is number 4 in the list. >>>>>When you download the list in dos format you can see that there is no program >>>>>that is number 4 so it is clear that it is shredder4. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>hmmm, very clear to everyone except me, if shredder 4 is number 4, then why >>>>ain't it listed. See right now I have no idea if you are telling the truth or >>>>being sacastic in response to what I write. If it is the truth, then its the >>>>first I have ever heard of that. >>> >>>You can see the results in >>>http://home3.swipnet.se/~w-36794/ssdf/rlwww004.txt >>> >>>1)You can see that program number 4 is missing. >>> >>>2)After the list of the programs there is a list of the results. >>>You can see that Fritz6 beated program 204 26-14 if you go down to look at the >>>list of the results. >>>There is no other program that Fritz6 beated 26-14 >>> >>>3)If you download the public ssdf games you can also see that Fritz6 won >>>Shredder4 26-14 >>> >>>4)204 is not in the list but other programs like 205 are in the list(205 is >>>number 15 in the list) >>> >>>I learned from this facts that 204 is shredder4. >>>The ssdf tries to hide shredder4 but if you are smart enough you have no problem >>>to find it. >>> >>>I cannot find the rating of shredder4(maybe I am not smart enough) but I have no >>>problem to find that it is number 4. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Ah I see, but I only ever look at the list published, never any of the fine >>details. It is stupid that it is not listed, I should not have to go looking as >>you explained to find proper details. They should just list the damn thing. >> >>Thanks for the info Uri > > > >Ossi Weiner, Millennium's director, threatened the SSDF to sue them if they >published the results of Shredder 4. > >It is indeed stupid, but it's Weiner's fault, not the SSDF's. > > > > Christophe I have an Athlon 700 and a Duron 700. Slightly better hardware than the SSDF. My question is,, would Mr. Weiner sue me if I played Shredder 4, or 5 And published the games here? Or sent them to SSDF. Because I am in the process of playing a large 40/40 on the two mentioned machines. Chris Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.