Author: Lars Sandin
Date: 19:39:48 11/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 03, 2000 at 09:59:28, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 03, 2000 at 08:37:23, José Carlos wrote: > >>On November 02, 2000 at 16:43:42, Marc van Hal wrote: >> >>>On November 02, 2000 at 06:38:07, Garry Evans wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I am about to purchase a thunderbird 800, I'm curious how would this processor >>>>compare to the krytech K63- 600?? Will the thunderbird outperform the machine >>>>that Ed used in the Grandmaster Challenges? How many nodes should I get with >>>>Fritz? >>>Well the answer to fritz is givven then Junior is more important cause Junior >>>realy is cpu based (between 17 and 18 plys deep in a tournament game about 20/21 >>>in endgames while indeed Fritz is more Hash table based >>>besides with Rebel century the average is about 450.000 in endgames 500.000 >>>With Nimzo98 /7.32 1.000.000 nodes a seconde >> >> Junior's depth is not what it seems. It's approx. twice the "real" depth (if >>that means anything). So Junior's 18 plies is similar to other program's 9 >>plies. >> >> José C. > >Depth 18 of Junior means 9 plies brute force but Junior does more extensions >than other programs so it is practically more than 9 plies of other programs. > >Uri One more interesting fact about Junior vs. Fritz. Other than me that has noticed the huge difference in tablebase-access´es on theese two? Nearly equal in search-speed (on an oc Duron 900), but Fritz allows nearly three quarters of its Nps to sink deeper in the tb´s; here Junior gives up only half of its search-speed. // Lars
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.