Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 22:13:03 11/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2000 at 13:32:13, pavel wrote:
>right way? tunning evaluations?
>all (top) program has reached a point that you can't do much improvement on the
>program; other than doing fancy tunning in eval codes, better PC (speed),
>learning.
WRONG.
Gambit Tiger is the result of a big change that includes ADDING KNOWLEDGE based
on the Chess Tiger framework.
Where did you hear this "tuning" story??? Gambit Tiger is no tuning at all, it's
a new thing.
>these are (AFAIK) the only ways to make your program better at this stage of
>"chess programing".
>(this is my assumption, but i believe in it)
Of course not. Any chess program, including mine, is very far from perfect. My
opinion about Chess Tiger and Gambit Tiger is that they are work in progress.
They are unfinished. They are this way since a long time, and I think they will
always be unfinished. Every year, big changes are done in my programs.
You can't go very far with "tuning" only.
>so truely there is no "paradigm", it's simply eval. tuning (as to now).
No it's not simply "tuning".
>Exactly!!
>I am sure he is a fine programer and he can do more than just tunning eval
>codes. :)
Of course. I have done much more than tuning my evaluation.
So you really believe it's just a matter of tuning? Come on!
Christophe
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.