Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 22:20:04 11/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2000 at 11:43:54, Uri Blass wrote:
>On November 05, 2000 at 11:27:43, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On November 05, 2000 at 00:27:18, Michael Cummings wrote:
>>
>>>On November 05, 2000 at 00:15:50, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 04, 2000 at 23:40:09, Michael Cummings wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 04, 2000 at 22:28:10, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On November 04, 2000 at 19:35:26, Michael Cummings wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>We all know why, Chessmaster, Rebel, Shredder and the like are not on the list,
>>>>>>>and I can understand that. But without them the list means very little to me
>>>>>>>these days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It is clear that shredder4 is number 4 in the list.
>>>>>>When you download the list in dos format you can see that there is no program
>>>>>>that is number 4 so it is clear that it is shredder4.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Uri
>>>>>
>>>>>hmmm, very clear to everyone except me, if shredder 4 is number 4, then why
>>>>>ain't it listed. See right now I have no idea if you are telling the truth or
>>>>>being sacastic in response to what I write. If it is the truth, then its the
>>>>>first I have ever heard of that.
>>>>
>>>>You can see the results in
>>>>http://home3.swipnet.se/~w-36794/ssdf/rlwww004.txt
>>>>
>>>>1)You can see that program number 4 is missing.
>>>>
>>>>2)After the list of the programs there is a list of the results.
>>>>You can see that Fritz6 beated program 204 26-14 if you go down to look at the
>>>>list of the results.
>>>>There is no other program that Fritz6 beated 26-14
>>>>
>>>>3)If you download the public ssdf games you can also see that Fritz6 won
>>>>Shredder4 26-14
>>>>
>>>>4)204 is not in the list but other programs like 205 are in the list(205 is
>>>>number 15 in the list)
>>>>
>>>>I learned from this facts that 204 is shredder4.
>>>>The ssdf tries to hide shredder4 but if you are smart enough you have no problem
>>>>to find it.
>>>>
>>>>I cannot find the rating of shredder4(maybe I am not smart enough) but I have no
>>>>problem to find that it is number 4.
>>>>
>>>>Uri
>>>
>>>Ah I see, but I only ever look at the list published, never any of the fine
>>>details. It is stupid that it is not listed, I should not have to go looking as
>>>you explained to find proper details. They should just list the damn thing.
>>>
>>>Thanks for the info Uri
>>
>>
>>
>>Ossi Weiner, Millennium's director, threatened the SSDF to sue them if they
>>published the results of Shredder 4.
>>
>>It is indeed stupid, but it's Weiner's fault, not the SSDF's.
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>I know that it was a decision of the ssdf.
>Ossi Weiner did not let them to publish the rating of other programs of the
>millenium package like Genius but he let them publish Shredder4's rating.
>
>The ssdf decided that if they have no right to publish the rating of other
>programs of the millenium then they are going to punish millenium and not to
>publish Shredder4's rating.
>
>Uri
And they were right and I still believe Ossi did a mistake.
He tried to control the SSDF and got what he deserved.
I don't remember he ever complained when his baby "Genius" was leading the SSDF,
several years ago.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.