Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 02:28:58 11/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 2000 at 22:52:39, pavel wrote: >On November 05, 2000 at 20:04:03, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On November 05, 2000 at 19:37:34, Netsurfer wrote: >> >>>Standings >>>Place Name Feder Rtg Loc Score M-Buch. Buch. Progr. >>> >>> 1 ShredderX, 1900 6.5 30.5 40.0 31.5 >>> 2-5 NimzoX, 1800 5.5 30.0 39.5 25.0 >>> Crafty, 2000 5.5 27.5 37.5 25.0 >>> JuniorX, 1600 5.5 27.0 35.5 26.0 >>> LambChop, 1300 5.5 26.5 35.0 22.0 >>> 6 DiepX, 1400 5 27.5 37.0 25.0 >>> 7-9 StormX, 900 4.5 29.0 39.0 19.5 >>> ZChess, 100 4.5 24.0 33.5 21.0 >>> InsomniacX, 1700 4.5 23.0 30.5 18.5 >>>10-11 Yace, 200 4 23.5 29.0 18.5 >>> Amateur, 1500 4 20.5 27.0 18.0 >>>12-15 ArasanX, 700 3.5 27.0 36.0 18.5 >>> Hossa, 1000 3.5 26.0 34.5 19.0 >>> Sjeng, 400 3.5 22.5 27.5 14.5 >>> TerraX, 300 3.5 19.0 24.5 11.5 >>>16-18 Tinker, 1100 3 22.5 28.0 14.0 >>> AvernoX, 800 3 22.0 27.5 11.0 >>> ShrikeX, 1200 3 20.0 24.5 13.5 >>> 19 Dorky, 600 2 22.5 28.0 8.0 >>> 20 Mint, 500 0 20.0 26.0 0.0 >> >>I think this was a very good result for Shredder. Equally, I am impressed with >>Nimzox, Lambchop ( Wow, great result ), and Diepx. >> >>I think if in the future that Diep has these type results, I may have to eat my >>words about the program. > >yes, DIEP was impressive >esp. the game against nimxox, where diep clearly saw the draw far ahead, and >nimzo still showing 1.28 for itself. > >Nimzox had high 'nps' on a a 1000mhz machine, but I am still surprised that it >turned second. As I wasn't much impressed by it's game. > >shredderx is the real hero, this guy is still using shredder4 > >to me impressive was the result of zchess23 and lambchop. > > >Pavs ;) What about storm X?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.