Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCT-2 Final standings.

Author: pavel

Date: 02:31:33 11/06/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 06, 2000 at 05:28:58, Aaron Tay wrote:

>On November 05, 2000 at 22:52:39, pavel wrote:
>
>>On November 05, 2000 at 20:04:03, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>
>>>On November 05, 2000 at 19:37:34, Netsurfer wrote:
>>>
>>>>Standings
>>>>Place Name         Feder Rtg  Loc Score M-Buch. Buch. Progr.
>>>>
>>>>  1   ShredderX,         1900     6.5      30.5  40.0   31.5
>>>> 2-5  NimzoX,            1800     5.5      30.0  39.5   25.0
>>>>      Crafty,            2000     5.5      27.5  37.5   25.0
>>>>      JuniorX,           1600     5.5      27.0  35.5   26.0
>>>>      LambChop,          1300     5.5      26.5  35.0   22.0
>>>>  6   DiepX,             1400     5        27.5  37.0   25.0
>>>> 7-9  StormX,            900      4.5      29.0  39.0   19.5
>>>>      ZChess,            100      4.5      24.0  33.5   21.0
>>>>      InsomniacX,        1700     4.5      23.0  30.5   18.5
>>>>10-11 Yace,              200      4        23.5  29.0   18.5
>>>>      Amateur,           1500     4        20.5  27.0   18.0
>>>>12-15 ArasanX,           700      3.5      27.0  36.0   18.5
>>>>      Hossa,             1000     3.5      26.0  34.5   19.0
>>>>      Sjeng,             400      3.5      22.5  27.5   14.5
>>>>      TerraX,            300      3.5      19.0  24.5   11.5
>>>>16-18 Tinker,            1100     3        22.5  28.0   14.0
>>>>      AvernoX,           800      3        22.0  27.5   11.0
>>>>      ShrikeX,           1200     3        20.0  24.5   13.5
>>>> 19   Dorky,             600      2        22.5  28.0    8.0
>>>> 20   Mint,              500      0        20.0  26.0    0.0
>>>
>>>I think this was a very good result for Shredder. Equally, I am impressed with
>>>Nimzox, Lambchop ( Wow, great result ), and Diepx.
>>>
>>>I think if in the future that Diep has these type results, I may have to eat my
>>>words about the program.
>>
>>yes, DIEP was impressive
>>esp. the game against nimxox, where diep clearly saw the draw far ahead, and
>>nimzo still showing 1.28 for itself.
>>
>>Nimzox had high 'nps' on a a 1000mhz machine, but I am still surprised that it
>>turned second. As I wasn't much impressed by it's game.
>>
>>shredderx is the real hero, this guy is still using shredder4
>>
>>to me impressive was the result of zchess23 and lambchop.
>>
>>
>>Pavs ;)
>
>What about storm X?

I dont know much about this program but it sure was runnign ona  nice cluster
machine :)
better than the one bob was using.

Pavel



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.